
A Virginia gun range must be allowed to open to customers despite a statewide executive order requiring nonessential businesses to close to slow the spread of the coronavirus, a judge ruled Monday.
The order issued by Lynchburg Circuit Judge F. Patrick Yeatts says federal and state protections on the right to bear arms outweigh any emergency authority held by Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam to order the gun range closed.
The SafeSide gun range in Lynchburg filed the lawsuit challenging the governor’s executive order, along with Gun Owners of America, the Virginia Citizens Defense League and the Association of Virginia Gun Ranges.
Attorney General Mark Herring’s office had argued that Northam’s emergency powers to protect public safety during a pandemic should be upheld.
Yeatts, though, said state law limits the governor’s power to regulate guns even in an emergency. He said Virginia’s Constitution includes language that parallels almost exactly the Second Amendment.
“The Governor appears to argue that, when he declares a state of emergency, he can ignore any law that limits his power, even laws designed to limit his powers in a state of emergency,” Yeatts wrote.
Yeatts granted an injunction that immediately allows the range to open, saying the gun range and its customers would suffer irreparable harm with any delay. In particular, he cited the livelihoods of the range employees and the need of gun owners to train with their weapons. He said closing the range is “especially unsettling for new gun owners with no prior firearm experience.”
Yeatts said nothing in his order applies to any other aspect of Northam’s executive order and only applies to the SafeSide Lynchburg facility.
Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, said he is happy the SafeSide range can open, but disappointed the order does not govern gun shops and ranges throughout Virginia. He said his group is talking with lawyers about the best way to get a broader ruling that would apply statewide.
The lawsuit is one of several that have challenged various aspects of Northam’s executive order, but other cases have upheld Northam’s power.
Earlier this month, a judge in southwest Virginia rejected a lawsuit that sought to carve ought a religious exemption to Northam’s executive order.
And in federal court in Alexandria, a Manassas man filed a challenge to the emergency order saying it violated First Amendment protections guaranteeing freedom of assembly. The suit sought an emergency injunction to halt enforcement of the executive order. But U.S District Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected the request, writing that “the only current emergency is the one caused by the coronavirus.”

VIDEO: Your support matters!
Your support matters! Donate today. @vadogwoodnews Your support matters! Visit our link in bio to donate today. #virginianews #virginia #community...

Op-Ed: Virginia’s new Democratic majorities pass key bills to improve your lives, but will Youngkin sign them?
The 2024 Virginia General Assembly regular session has wrapped up. It was a peculiar session from the outset, with Democratic majorities in the...

Op-Ed: Why Virginia Needs A Constitutional Amendment Protecting Reproductive Freedom
Virginia’s recent election season in 2023 drew in eyes from all over the country. Reproductive freedom was on the line and Virginia remained the...

From the state rock to the state flower, here’s how Virginia got its symbols
Have you ever wondered why the Dogwood is the state flower? Or how the cardinal became the state bird? We’re here to answer those questions and more...

VIDEO: Second-gentleman Douglas Emhoff gives speech on reproductive freedom
Second gentleman, Douglas Emhoff touched on reproductive freedom not only being a woman's issue but "an everyone's issue" during the Biden-Harris...

Glenn Youngkin and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad night
Election Day 2023 has come and gone, and while there are votes to be counted, one thing is perfectly clear: Virginians unequivocally rejected Gov....