News

Federal judge backtracks on "landmark" abortion ruling

In a startling twist of events, U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson canceled his own decision to strike down a Virginia law that said only physicians could perform first-trimester abortions. Hudson, who made his initial ruling last week, reversed course on Tuesday, saying he needed to hear more information during the trial, which begins Monday.…


In a startling twist of events, U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson canceled his own decision to strike down a Virginia law that said only physicians could perform first-trimester abortions.

Hudson, who made his initial ruling last week, reversed course on Tuesday, saying he needed to hear more information during the trial, which begins Monday. In a two-page order, Hudson wrote that โ€œwhether the โ€˜Physicians-Only Lawโ€™ presents an undue burden to Virginia women who seek an abortion is a material fact that is genuinely in dispute.โ€ Hudson was appointed to the court by President George W. Bush.

Hudson will preside over the two-week trial in the case filed last June by the ACLU of Virginia, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and the law firm Oโ€™Melveny and Myers. The groups filed on behalf of various abortion care providers, including the Falls Church Healthcare Center and Whole Womanโ€™s Health Alliance.

Hudsonโ€™s decision to change course was called โ€œunusualโ€ by one federal court expert and anti-choice groups celebrated Hudsonโ€™s reversal.

Hudsonโ€™s decision had been hailed as a โ€œlandmarkโ€ ruling, because it was the first federal court decision to overturn a law banning advanced clinicians from performing first-trimester abortions. Hudsonโ€™s initial ruling would have allowed nurse practitioners and physicianโ€™s assistants to provide first-trimester abortions in Virginia.

The state of Virginia has argued that having physicians involved in all abortions has medical benefits and places only a minimal burden on patients and doctors.

Pro-choice activists disagreed, arguing that the law is intended to restrict abortion access. In response to Hudsonโ€™s reversal, Jenny Ma, senior staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights and its lead counsel on the case, told the Washington Post that there is โ€œoverwhelming evidence that medical professionals other than physicians can safely and effectively provide abortion care. We will be presenting this evidence at trial next week.โ€


Categories:

Authors

  • Keya Vakil is the deputy political editor at COURIER. He previously worked as a researcher in the film industry and dabbled in the political world.